4.6 Article

Programmed Death-1 Restrains the Germinal Center in Type 1 Diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 203, Issue 4, Pages 844-852

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801535

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 AI106791, U24 AI118635, P01 AI35296]
  2. Helmsley Charitable Trust [2018PG-T1D058]
  3. Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics MNP [18.01]
  4. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [3-2014-215]
  5. Center for Autoimmune Disease Research Pilot Award [UMF0020624]
  6. Frieda Martha Kunze Fellowship
  7. NIH [T35 AI118620, R37 AI039560, F30 AI131483, T32 AI007313]
  8. University of Minnesota Foundation Fund [11724]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibits T and B cell function upon ligand binding. PD-1 blockade revolutionized cancer treatment, and although numerous patients respond, some develop autoimmune-like symptoms or overt autoimmunity characterized by auto-antibody production. PD-1 inhibition accelerates autoimmunity in mice, but its role in regulating germinal centers (GC) is controversial. To address the role of PD-1 in the GC reaction in type 1 diabetes, we used tetramers to phenotype insulin-specific CD4(+) T and B cells in NOD mice. PD-1 or PD-Ll deficiency, and PD-1 but not PD-L2 blockade, unleashed insulin-specific T follicular helper CD4(+) T cells and enhanced their survival. This was concomitant with an increase in GC B cells and augmented insulin autoantibody production. The effect of PD-1 blockade on the GC was reduced when mice were treated with a mAb targeting the insulin peptide:MHC class II complex. This work provides an explanation for autoimmune side effects following PD-1 pathway inhibition and suggests that targeting the self-peptide:MHC class II complex might limit autoimmunity arising from checkpoint blockade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available