4.7 Article

Degradation of antibiotic chloramphenicol in water by pulsed discharge plasma combined with TiO2/WO3 composites: mechanism and degradation pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 371, Issue -, Pages 666-676

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.051

Keywords

Pulsed discharge plasma; TiO2/WO3; Catalysis; Chloramphenicol; Degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulsed discharge plasma (PDP) combined with TiO2/WO3 composites for chloramphenicol (CAP) degradation was investigated. The prepared TiO2/WO3 composites were characterized by scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope, nitrogen adsorption apparatus, zeta sizer, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectra, UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, photocurrent and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The degradation performance showed that the addition of TiO2/WO3 composites significantly enhanced the removal efficiency of CAP in PDP system. At a peak voltage of 18 kV, the highest removal efficiency of CAP could reach 88.1% in PDP system with 4 wt% TiO2/WO3, which was 36.8% and 26.0% higher than that in sole PDP system and PDP/TiO2 system, respectively. The TiO2/WO3 composites significantly accelerated interfacial charge transfer process compared to the pure TiO2. Besides, the effect of catalyst dosage and peak voltage on CAP removal was evaluated. (OH)-O-center dot, O-3 O-center dot(2)-, h(+) and high-energy electrons contributed to CAP degradation in PDP-TiO2/WO3 system. Addition of TiO2/WO3 composites can decompose 03 and produce more (OH)-O-center dot and H2O2. The degradation intermediates were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and ion chromatography (IC). The cycling degradation experiment showed that the TiO2/WO3 composites have good reusability as well as stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available