4.7 Article

Considerations for emission monitoring and liner analysis of thermally manufactured sewer cured-in-place-pipes (CIPP)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 371, Issue -, Pages 540-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.097

Keywords

Hazardous air pollutants; VOC; SVOC; Plastic; Styrene

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation RAPID Grant [CBET-1624183]
  2. Purdue University [CBET-1624183]
  3. crowdfunding
  4. U.S. Federal Highway Administration pooled fund project [TPF-5(339)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cured-in-place-pipes (CIPP) are plastic liners chemically manufactured inside existing damaged sewer pipes. They are gaining popularity in North America, Africa, Asia, Europe, and Oceania. Volatile and semi-volatile organic compound (VOC/SVOC) emissions from storm sewer CIPP installations were investigated at a dedicated outdoor research site. Tedlar bag, sorbent tube, and photoionization detector (PID) air sampling was conducted for five steam-CIPP installations and was coupled with composite characterizations. New CIPPs contained up to 2.21 wt% volatile material and only 6-31% chemical mass extracted per CIPP was identified. Each 6.1 m [20 ft] liner contained an estimated 5-10 kg [11-22 lbs] of residual chemical. Extracted chemicals included hazardous air pollutants and suspected and known carcinogens that were not reported by others. These included monomers, monomer oxidation products, antioxidants, initiator degradation products, and a plasticizer. PID signals did not accurately represent styrene air concentration differing sometimes by 10s- to 1000s-fold. Multiple VOCs found in air samples likely affected PID responses. Styrene ( > 86.4 ppm(v)) and methylene chloride ( > 1.56 ppm(v)) air concentrations were likely greater onsite and phenol was also detected. Additional studies are needed to examine pollutant emissions so process monitoring can be improved, and environment impacts and associated human exposures can be minimized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available