4.7 Article

The relative importance of different carbon structures in biochars to carbamazepine and bisphenol A sorption

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 373, Issue -, Pages 106-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.078

Keywords

Biochar; Bleaching; Carbon forms; Organic contaminants; Sorption

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0801000]
  2. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [U1602231, 41725016, 41673098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochar, a carbon-rich material, has attracted immense attention owing to its applications in soil remediation. However, the mechanisms by which heterogeneous carbon structures of biochars immobilize organic contaminants are not yet fully understood. In this study, the noncondensed aromatic components in biochars were selectively removed through bleaching. Different techniques, such as C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance, were applied to characterize the biochar compositions, and thus the role of the different carbon structures in organic contaminant sorption was discussed. The aromatic carbon structures in biochars were gradually developed and evolved from noncondensed to condensed structure with increasing pyrolytic temperatures from 300 to 700 degrees C. Based on elemental analysis, the carbon removed by bleaching decreased from 43.9% to 5.92% with increasing temperatures. After the surface area normalization of the apparent sorption, bleaching increased the sorption of carbamazepine and bisphenol A on biochars produced at 500 degrees C, but not for those produced at 300 and 700 degrees C. Bleaching removed noncondensed aromatics and enriched condensed aromatics, which resulted in increased sorption. However, bleaching also resulted in the blockage of micropores in biochars with abundant condensed aromatics, causing decreased sorption. The apparent sorption was determined by the balancing of these two opposite effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available