4.4 Article

Mechanical behavior and AE and EMR characteristics of natural and saturated coal samples in the indirect tensile process

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 753-763

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jge/gxz045

Keywords

saturated coal sample; indirect tensile; mechanical behavior; acoustic emission; electromagnetic radiation

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019XKQYMS55]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The differences between mechanical properties and acoustic emission (AE) and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) characteristics of natural coal samples and saturated coal samples were analyzed by performing indirect tensile experiments. The experimental results show that coal samples go through four stages: compaction, elastic deformation, plastic deformation and failure. There is good correspondence between AE and EMR signals and the damage to coal samples. Under the action of water, tension strength of samples is reduced, while the plasticity is enhanced; also, the softening coefficient of tensile strength becomes 0.65. The saturated coal samples have a longer plastic stage and a more obvious AE quiet period. The damage to natural coal samples is tension damage, while that of saturated coal samples is due to tension and shear damage, which is more sufficient and irregular. EMR is still remarkable when AE is in a quiet period, and EMR is better for the precursor of rupture. Water weakens the generation and propagation of AE and EMR signals, especially in the earlier stage. AE and EMR damage factor D, defined by AE and EMR counts, has a better description of the damage degree in the indirect tensile process. This study is of great significance for research on the damage mechanism of water-bearing coal, the stability monitoring of water-bearing coals in the actual engineering process and the effect evaluation of hydraulic flushing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available