4.5 Article

Implementation of a structured communication tool improves family satisfaction and expectations in the intensive care unit

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 6-12

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.011

Keywords

Communication; Relatives; Intensive-care; Expectations; Satisfaction; Tool

Funding

  1. Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research [No-2014/106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) physicians should provide relatives of critically ill patients with appropriate and clear information, regarding prognosis, treatment options and expectations. Objectives: To assess whether a structured communication tool improves satisfaction with care and engenders realistic expectations among relatives of critically ill patients. Study design: A controlled. pre-post intervention design was implemented in the General and Medical ICUs in the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Methods: Forty relatives of patients who received usual communication from the medical staff (control group) were interviewed. We then implemented a structured communication tool and another forty family members were interviewed (intervention group). The ICU physicians who participated in the family meeting were also interviewed. Results: Satisfaction in the intervention group was higher regarding ease of obtaining the information (90% vs 70%, p = .025) and the consistency of information provided (925% vs 77.5%, p .057). There was better correlation between physicians' and relatives' expectations in the intervention group regarding hospital survival (Kappa 0.322 vs 0.054, p = .01). Physicians predicted more accurately patients' actual hospital survival. Conclusions: A structured communication tool was associated with improved family satisfaction with communication and expectations regarding hospital survival. Further research is required to evaluate this promising intervention. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available