4.5 Article

Usefulness of a quantitative analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid volume proportion in brain computed tomography for predicting neurological prognosis in cardiac arrest survivors who undergo target temperature management

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 170-174

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.024

Keywords

Heart arrest; Prognosis; Oedema, cerebrospinal fluid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Brain swelling post-cardiac arrest may affect cerebrospinal fluid volume. We aimed to investigate the prognostic performance of the proportion of cerebrospinal fluid volume (pCSFV) using brain computed tomography (CT) in cardiac arrest survivors. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included adult comatose cardiac arrest survivors who underwent brain CT scan prior to target temperature management (TTM) from 2015 to 2016. Grey-to-white matter ratio (GWR) and pCSFV values were calculated. pCSFV analysis was performed using automated quantitative analysis programming. The primary outcome was a 6-month neurological outcome. Results: Of 251 patients (median age, 57 years), 173 (68.9%) were male, 87 (34.7%) had a shockable rhythm, and 160 (63.7%) had unfavourable neurological outcomes. GWR but not pCSFV was significantly higher in terms of favourable neurological outcomes (p = .015). pCSFV prognostic performances were similar to GWR, and were poor overall, (0.521; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.446-0.694 vs. 0.515; 95% CI, 0.441-0.589). After adjusting for covariates, pCSFV but not GWR was independently associated with neurological outcome 6 months following cardiac arrest (p = .049). Conclusion: pCSFV was independently associated with neurological outcome 6 months following cardiac arrest, however prognostic performance was not good. (C) 2019 Elsevier inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available