4.6 Article

Cyclic Load Tests on Precast Segmental Bridge Columns with Both Steel and Basalt FRP Reinforcement

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000944

Keywords

Precast segmental columns; Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars; Hybrid reinforced columns; Seismic performance; Self-centering capability

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0703001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478143, 51278150]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201606120180]
  4. Nanjing Fenghui Composite Material Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an experimental investigation of a novel precast segmental bridge column (PSBC) that is longitudinally reinforced with both fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars and conventional steel bars. The major objectives of this study were (1)to compare the seismic performance of FRP-steel-reinforced PSBCs (FSR-PSBCs) with the conventional steel-reinforced PSBC (SR-PSBC) members; and (2)to investigate the effects of the proportion of FRP to steel reinforcement and the gravity load level on the cyclic behavior of the FSR-PSBC. To this end, quasi-static tests were conducted on four large-scale PSBC specimens with heights of 4.2 m and cross sections of 0.6 x 0.4 m. Basalt FRP (BFRP) bars were employed in the FSR-PSBC specimens. Test results showed that as compared with the SR-PSBC, FSR-PSBC specimens exhibited appreciably improved self-centering capacities, postyield stiffness ratios, displacement ductility, and comparable hysteretic energy dissipation abilities. Furthermore, after the FSR-PSBC specimens were cyclically loaded up to a drift ratio of 5.5%, the damages were insignificant and could be repaired rapidly, indicating promising post-earthquake serviceability of these bridge columns. (c) 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available