4.4 Article

Effects of material and process parameters on void evolution in unidirectional prepreg during vacuum bag-only cure

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 633-645

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998319864420

Keywords

Prepreg; interply void; out of autoclave processing

Funding

  1. Airbus Institute for Engineering Research
  2. National Science Foundation through a project entitled Sustainable Manufacturing Using Out-of-Autoclave Prepregs'' [CMMI-1229011]
  3. M.C. Gill Composites Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Void reduction during composites manufacturing is critical for successful processing. In this study, we perform a parametric study to determine the mechanisms of interply void evolution in unidirectional prepregs during vacuum bag-only cure and to identify the key factors that affect interply air removal. We employ an in situ visualization setup for direct, real-time observation of air removal for prepregs during cure. Results showed that super-ambient dwell at 50celcius effectively promoted interply air removal in unidirectional prepregs, reduced vacuum quality (80% vacuum) had negligible effects on part quality, and that an increase in moisture content of the laminate notably increased void content. Prepreg moisture content was tracked by the inspection of laminate water content at different times during the cure cycle, and the data was combined with a diffusion-based analytical model to predict void size and to improve the understanding of void evolution mechanisms. Results indicated that moisture content of the laminate decreased markedly as cure progressed, providing insights into bubble behavior (expansion and shrinkage) observed during cure. The modified model predictions aligned with experimental data, especially during the second stage, confirming that the observed void growth results from moisture diffusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available