Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 129, Issue 9, Pages 3625-3639Publisher
AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI126363
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIH [PO1AI060699, RO1AI129269, R21AG060222]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Type 1 IFNs (IFN-I) generally protect mammalian hosts from virus infections, but in some cases, IFN-I is pathogenic. Because IFN-I is protective, it is commonly used to treat virus infections for which no specific approved drug or vaccine is available. The Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is such an infection, yet little is known about the role of IFN-I in this setting. Here, we show that IFN-I signaling is protective during MERS-CoV infection. Blocking IFN-I signaling resulted in delayed virus clearance, enhanced neutrophil infiltration, and impaired MERS-CoV-specific T cell responses. Notably, IFN-I administration within 1 day after infection (before virus titers peak) protected mice from lethal infection, despite a decrease in IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) and inflammatory cytokine gene expression. In contrast, delayed IFN-beta treatment failed to effectively inhibit virus replication; increased infiltration and activation of monocytes, macrophages. and neutrophils in the lungs; and enhanced proinflammatory cytokine expression, resulting in fatal pneumonia in an otherwise sublethal infection. Together, these results suggest that the relative timing of the IFN-I response and maximal virus replication is key in determining outcomes, at least in infected mice. By extension, IFN-alpha beta or combination therapy may need to be used cautiously to treat viral infections in clinical settings.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available