4.7 Article

Sustainable stabilization/solidification of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash by incorporation of green materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 335-343

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.057

Keywords

Hazardous waste treatment; Green/sustainable remediation; Metal/metalloid leachability; Waste valorization/recycling; Wood waste biochar; Incinerator ash

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [E-PolyU503/17, PolyU 15223517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash (IFA) is categorized as a hazardous waste, which requires proper treatment prior to landfilling due to its high concentrations of toxic elements. This study developed an innovative and cleaner method for stabilization/solidification (S/S) of IFA by the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and green stabilizers. Quantitative X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analyses indicated that toxic elements in IFA inhibited the cement hydration. Therefore, the single use of cement (10 wt%) was not efficient for the immobilization of toxic elements, especially for Pb. The incorporation of SCMs (20 wt% of binder) such as silica fume facilitated the formation of additional cement hydrates and reduced Pb leachability by 36.3%. The addition of green stabilizers such as potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) and wood waste-derived biochar also improved the immobilization of toxic elements. KDP directly combined with Pb2+ to form a precipitate of Pb-3(PO4)(2), whereas biochar promoted the generation of cement hydrates for S/S via the effect of internal curing. The incorporation of silica fume (40 wt%) in the binder was the most effective. Overall, this study demonstrated that the selected green binders can serve as low-carbon and high-efficient material for S/S of hazardous ash residue such as IFA. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available