4.7 Article

Does the knowledge and acceptance of an increasing block tariffs policy strengthen residents' gas-saving intention? Evidence from household-level survey data

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages 289-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.135

Keywords

Household-level survey; Increasing block tariffs policy; Gas-saving intention; Probit model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71503065, 71503249, 71874193]
  2. Ministry of education of humanities and social science research youth fund of China [14YJC630061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Residents' gas-saving intention is of great significance to energy conservation, environmental protection, and sustainable development of clean energy. Based on micro household-level survey data from the city of Hefei, this paper uses logit and probit models to examine the relationship among residents' knowledge, acceptance of the increasing block tariffs policy for household gas (IBTsPHG), and their gas-saving intention; the consumption characteristics of residents were discussed. The results show that residents' knowledge of the IBTsPHG has a significant positive impact on its acceptance, which has a significant positive impact on residents' gas-saving intention; the higher the average gas price, the lower the willingness of residents to accept the IBTsPHG; compared with low-income households, high-income households have a lower willingness to accept the IBTsPHG; and households using wall-mounted gas boilers have a lower willingness to accept the IBTsPHG and stronger gas-saving intention but higher gas consumption. In addition, household characteristics, such as dwelling area, education, and occupation significantly affect residents' saving intention. Policy implications are derived from the analysis. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available