4.6 Article

Qualitative screening and quantitative determination of 569 pesticide residues in honeysuckle using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-Orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1606, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460374

Keywords

Pesticide residues; Qualitative and quantitative analysis; Honeysuckle; UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS; QuEChERS

Funding

  1. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1410200]
  2. National Key RD Program [2017YFC1700800]
  3. Shanghai Professional Technology Platform [18DZ2292200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method for both qualitative screening and quantitative determination of 569 pesticides in honeysuckle was developed based on ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled to quadrupole-Orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry and an in-house executable compound database involving the theoretical masses of precursor and fragment ions and retention times. Different workflows were evaluated, validated and compared including Full MS-SIM, Full MS/ddMS(2), Full WAIF and Full MS/DIA. For qualitative analysis, Full MS/DIA showed relatively low screening detection limits (SDLs) for most pesticides, but its MS2 identification seemed to be not reliable enough. Full MS/ddMS(2) showed good repeatability of fragment ion recognition and less false positives. For quantitative analysis, the results of four workflows were comparable in terms of linearity and trueness, while Full MS-SIM and Full MS/ddMS(2) gave better precision than the other two workflows for most pesticides at the spiking level of 0.01 mg/kg. Therefore, UHPLC-Full MS/dd MS2 was considered as the optimal workflow for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of honeysuckle samples. Pesticides were present in 75 of the 82 investigated samples, with concentrations ranging from 10.0 to 4116.9 mu g/kg in some of the most severely contaminated samples. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available