4.6 Article

Poly-L-lysine-based tissue embedding compatible with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry imaging analysis of dry and fragile aristolochia plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1608, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460389

Keywords

Poly-L-lysine; MALDI-MSI; Aristolochia plant tissue; Aristolochic acids I; Aristolochic acids II

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675025, 21705025]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2018J01683]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The integrity of tissue is crucial for a high-quality analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry image (MALDI-MSI). Various embedding media utilized in traditional tissue-sectioning techniques are generally not recommended for MALDI-MSI of dry and fragile plant tissues because of the ion suppression effect in MALDI ionization in the low-mass region as well as the undesirable structural deformation during the sample preparation. In this work, a novel poly-L-lysine (PLL)-based tissue embedding method was developed for MALDI-MSI analysis of dry and fragile aristolochia plant (AP) tissues. The practical application in fixation, embedding, cryosectioning, and mounting of the dry and fragile AP tissues demonstrated that the PLL-based embedding technique could provide good rigidity to the plant tissues analysis compared to that without embedding and gelatin embedding. With the assistance of the PLL embedding medium, high spatial resolution molecular ion maps of main compounds, including aristolochic acids I (AAI) and aristolochic acids II (AAII) in AP root tissue, could be achieved by MALDI-MSI with enhanced signal intensities and no obvious background interference. This work provides an alternative approach for embedding the dry and fragile plant tissues comparable with MALDI-MSI analysis. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available