4.7 Article

Performance of Delta-Coupled-Cluster Methods for Calculations of Core-Ionization Energies of First-Row Elements

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 4945-4955

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00568

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A thorough study of the performance of delta-coupled-cluster (Delta CC) methods for calculations of core-ionization energies for elements of the first long row of the periodic table is reported. Inspired by the core-valence separation (CVS) scheme in response theories, a simple CVS scheme of excluding the vacant core orbital from the CC treatment has been adopted to solve the convergence problem of the CC equations for core-ionized states. Dynamic correlation effects have been shown to make important p. contributions to the computed core-ionization energies, especially to chemical shifts of these quantities. The maximum absolute error (MaxAE) and standard deviation (SD) of delta-Hartree-Fock results for chemical shifts of core-ionization energies with respect to the corresponding experimental values amount to more than 1.7 and 0.6 eV, respectively. In contrast, the inclusion of electron correlation in Delta CC singles and doubles augmented with a noniterative triples correction [Delta CCSD(T)] method significantly reduces the corresponding deviations to around 0.3 and 0.1 eV. With the consideration of basis set effects and the corrections to the CVS approximation, Delta CCSD(T) has been shown to provide highly accurate results for absolute values of core-ionization energies, with a MaxAE of 0.22 eV and SD of 0.13 eV. To further demonstrate the usefulness of Delta CCSD(T), calculations of carbon K-edge ionization energies of ethyl trifluoroacetate, a molecule of significant interest to the study of X-ray spectroscopy and dynamics, are reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available