4.7 Article

Assessing Electronic Structure Methods for Long-Range Three-Body Dispersion Interactions: Analysis and Calculations on Well-Separated Metal Atom Trimers

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 4351-4361

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00050

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300P2_164631]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300P2_164631] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-body dispersion interactions are much weaker than their two-body counterpart. However, their importance grows quickly as the number of interacting monomers rises. To explore the numerical performance of correlation methods for long-range three-body dispersion, we performed calculations on eight very simple dispersion-dominated model metal trimers: Na-3, Mg-3, Zn-3, Cd-3, Hg-3, Cu-3, Ag-3, and Au-3. One encouraging aspect is that relatively small basis sets of augmented triple-zeta size appear to be adequate for three-body dispersion in the long-range. Coupled cluster calculations were performed at high levels to assess MP3, CCSD, CCSD(T), empirical density functional theory dispersion (D3), and the many-body dispersion (MBD) approach. We found that the accuracy of CCSD(T) was generally significantly lower than for two-body interactions, with errors sometimes reaching 20% in the investigated systems, while CCSD and particularly MP3 were generally more erratic. MBD is found to perform better than D3 at large distances, whereas the opposite is true at shorter distances. When computing reference numbers for three-body dispersion, care should be taken to appropriately represent the effect of the connected triple excitations, which are significant in most cases and incompletely approximated by CCSD(T).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available