Journal
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 150, Issue 22, Pages -Publisher
AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5092586
Keywords
-
Funding
- City University of New York High Performance Computing Center under NSF [CNS-0855217, CNS-0958379, ACI-1126113]
- NIST [70NANB15H282]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Glasses are out-of-equilibrium systems whose state cannot be uniquely defined by the usual set of equilibrium state variables. Here, we seek to identify an expanded set of variables that uniquely define the state of a glass. The potential energy landscape (PEL) formalism is a useful approach within statistical mechanics to describe supercooled liquids and glasses. We use the PEL formalism and computer simulations to study the transformations between low-density amorphous ice (LDA) and high-density amorphous ice (HDA). We employ the ST2 water model, which exhibits an abrupt first-order-like phase transition from LDA to HDA, similar to that observed in experiments. We prepare a number of distinct samples of both LDA and HDA that have completely different preparation histories. We then study the evolution of these LDA and HDA samples during compression and decompression at temperatures sufficiently low that annealing is absent and also during heating. We find that the evolution of each glass sample, during compression/decompression or heating, is uniquely determined by six macroscopic properties of the initial glass sample. These six quantities consist of three conventional thermodynamic state variables, the number of molecules N, the system volume V, and the temperature T, as well as three properties of the PEL, the inherent structure (IS) energy E-IS, the IS pressure P-IS, and the average curvature of the PEL at the IS SIS. In other words, (N,V,T,EIS,PIS,SIS) are state variables that define the glass state in the case of amorphous ice. An interpretation of our results in terms of the PEL formalism is provided. Since the behavior of water in the glassy state is more complex than for most substances, our results suggest that these six state variables may be applicable to amorphous solids in general and that there may be situations in which fewer than six variables would be sufficient to define the state of a glass.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available