4.5 Article

Dealing With Endogeneity in Threshold Models Using Copulas

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 166-178

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2019.1647213

Keywords

Bootstrap; Copulas; Foreign trade multiplier; Structural threshold model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This proposed method based on Copula theory offers a new approach to addressing the endogeneity issue of the threshold variable in structural threshold regression models, demonstrating robustness to nonlinear dependence structures between the regression error term and the threshold variable.
We suggest a new method dealing with the problem of endogeneity of the threshold variable in structural threshold regression models based on copula theory. This method enables us to relax the assumption that the threshold variable is normally distributed and to capture the dependence structure between the threshold regression error term and the threshold variable independently of the marginal distribution of the threshold variable. For Gaussian and Student's t copulas, this dependent structure can be captured by copula-type transformations of the distribution of the threshold variable, for each regime of the model. Augmenting the threshold model under these transformations can control for the endogeneity problem of threshold variable. The single-factor correlation structure of the threshold regression error term with these transformations allows us to consistently estimate the threshold and the slope parameters of the model based on a least squares method. Based on a Monte Carlo study, we show that our method is robust to nonlinear dependence structures between the regression error term and the threshold variable implied by the Archimedean family of copulas. We illustrate the method by estimating a model of the foreign-trade multiplier for seven OECD economies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available