4.5 Article

A single-spring model predicts the majority of variance in impact force during a fall onto the outstretched hand

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 149-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.042

Keywords

Forward fall; Impact force; Prediction; Outstretched hand; Single-spring model (SSM)

Funding

  1. CIHR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to validate a single-spring model in predicting measured impact forces during an outstretched arm falling scenario. Using an integrated force plate, impact forces were assessed from 10 young adults (5 males; 5 females), falling from planted knees onto outstretched arms, from a random order of drop heights: 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm. A single-spring model incorporating body mass, drop height plus the estimated linear stiffness of the upper extremity (hand, wrist and arm) was used to predict impact force on the hand. We used an analysis of variance linearity test to test the validity of using a linear stiffness coefficient in the model. We used linear regression to assess variance (R-2) in experimental impact force predicted by the single-spring model. We derived optimum linear stiffness coefficients for male, female and sex-combined. Our results indicated that the association between experimental and predicted impact forces was linear (P < 0.05). Explain variance in experimental impact force was R-2 = 0.82 for sex-combined, R-2 = 0.88 for males and R-2 = 0.84 for females. Optimum stiffness coefficients were 7436 N/m for sex-combined, 8989 N/m for males and 4527 N/m for females. In conclusion, a linear spring coefficient used in the single-spring model proved valid for predicting impact forces from fall heights up to 25 cm. Results also suggest the use of sex-specific spring coefficients when estimating impact force using the single-spring model. This model may improve impact force to bone strength ratios (factor-of-risk) and prediction of forearm and wrist fracture. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available