4.5 Article

Resource redistribution effects on annual plant communities in a runoff harvesting system in dryland

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.05.012

Keywords

Nutrient enrichment; Species richness; Biomass; Forb; Grasses; Water enrichment; Conductivity; Dryland watershed management

Funding

  1. Jewish National Fund [01-13-101-02]
  2. European Union [641762, 654359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to study the effect of resource redistribution on annual plant species diversity in Runoff-Harvesting Systems, termed limans, along the runoff pathway in a watershed. We tested the effect of resource redistribution (water and nutrients) relative role of biomass, grass and forb abundance as mediators of species diversity. Our research was conducted in five small watersheds located in the central Negev Highlands, Israel. We quantified nutrient addition including soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, total water content, and soil organic matter, in the liman, compared with two microsites (upstream, and downstream) along watersheds. We quantified biomass, grass and forb abundance and species richness in two successive years. We used structural equation modeling to study the effect of grass and forb abundance and biomass on the species richness of herbaceous plant communities. All tested soil properties significantly improved in the lint= compared with the two microsites. Annual biomass increased significantly in the liman in compared with the downstream microsite. Our results also indicate a reduction in forb abundance in the liman and the downstream, and increment in the grass abundance in the liman microsite, leading to a decline in plant species richness. We conclude that diversity responses to biomass production are both resource-specific and functional group-specific.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available