4.3 Article

Ground slowly moving target detection and velocity estimation via high-speed platform dual-beam synthetic aperture radar

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.13.026516

Keywords

ground slowly moving target; high-speed platform; detection and azimuth velocity estimation; along-track dual-beam SAR; back projection; a refocusing method

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017-YFB0502700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571099, 61501098, 61671113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the spectrum of a moving target being almost submerged in ground clutter, it is difficult for high-speed platform synthetic aperture radar to indicate a slowly moving target by traditional methods. To solve this problem, a detection and azimuth velocity estimation method is proposed based on along-track dual-beam synthetic aperture radar mode. Back projection is adopted to focus the forward-and backward-looking-beam images due to abilities such as automatic coregistration and geometric correction. The positions of the moving target in the two images are deduced, and we show that there is an azimuth location offset for the moving target in the forward-and-backward-looking images proportional to its azimuth velocity, which can be used to detect the moving target and estimate its azimuth velocity. Furthermore, a refocusing method is proposed to obtain a more accurate estimation. Simulation results show that the proposed method can detect slowly moving targets, especially those only with an azimuth velocity, which is difficult for many existing methods. In addition, the accuracy of azimuth velocity estimation can reach 0.01 m/s when the signal-to-clutter ratio is greater than 5 dB under simulation conditions. (C) 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available