4.6 Article

Mechanical property improvement and fire hazard reduction of ammonium polyphosphate microencapsulated in rigid polyurethane foam

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.48307

Keywords

flame retardance; mechanical properties; thermal properties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806113]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2016CYJS09B01, ZR2019MEE114, ZR2018MEE034]
  3. Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program, China [J18KA098]
  4. Talent Fund of Shandong Collaborative Innovation Center of Eco-Chemical Engineering
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017CXNL02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ammonium polyphosphate (APP) is an effective phosphorus-containing flame retardant. But APP also has excellent hygroscopic capacity and decreases the mechanical property of composite. The aim of the study was to microencapsulate APP with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) to prepare microencapsulated ammonium polyphosphate (PMAPP) in order to eliminate the harmful effects caused by the mechanical property of composite. The microcapsules are characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TG), and hydroscopicity test and observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Fire hazard of rigid polyurethane foam (RPUF) is evaluated using a cone calorimeter and limited oxygen index test. The mechanical property of RPUF is studied by compressive strength test. The results show that APP has been microencapsulated by PMMA successfully and the shell does not decrease the beneficial effect of APP on fire hazard of RPUF. Furthermore, the shell also reduces the damage of APP on the mechanical property of composite. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 48307.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available