4.4 Article

Characteristics of source wavelets generated by two sparkers

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103819

Keywords

Sparker; Source wavelet; Source level; Dominant frequency; Acoustic energy; High resolution seismic exploration

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0303901, 2017YFC0307403]
  2. NSFC [U1606401, 41476080]
  3. China postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642437]
  4. Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean [201405036-2]
  5. Research Fund for the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province [TSPD20161007]
  6. Stable Supporting Fund of Acoustics Science and Technology Laboratory [SSJSWDZC2018017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sparker is used as an explosive seismic source in high-resolution oceanic explorations, however, further analysis is necessary to evaluate the source level, dominant frequency, and bandwidth of the generated source wavelets. In this study, we investigated source wavelets produced by two commercial sparkers with a multi-electrode array. All recorded signals were obtained in shallow water. A SIG 5mille (Services and Instruments of Geophysique) sparker generates a typical wavelet with an expansion pulse, ghosts and a notable collapse pulse, whereas the collapse pulse generated by a ZJUPSS (Plasma Seismic Source of Zhejiang University) sparker is much weaker because of the lower discharge energy per electrode. Nevertheless, the ZJUPSS expansion pulse magnitude is substantially higher than that of the SIG 5mille, and the former's sound source level reaches 223 dB at only 900 J. The SIG 5mille expansion pulse width is broader than that of the ZJUPSS, resulting in a lower dominant frequency down to 232 Hz at 2500 J, but the latter has more high-frequency components leading to better vertical resolution. The acoustic energy efficiency of the ZJUPSS ranges up to 4% higher than that of the SIG 5mille (<1%). (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available