4.3 Article

Bleeding detection in wireless capsule endoscopy videos - Color versus texture features

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 141-154

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12662

Keywords

bleeding detection; color feature; machine learning; texture feature; wireless capsule endoscopy

Funding

  1. FRINATEK project EONS, Norway [231687]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) is an effective technology that can be used to make a gastrointestinal (GI) tract diagnosis of various lesions and abnormalities. Due to a long time required to pass through the GI tract, the resulting WCE data stream contains a large number of frames which leads to a tedious job for clinical experts to perform a visual check of each and every frame of a complete patient's video footage. In this paper, an automated technique for bleeding detection based on color and texture features is proposed. The approach combines the color information which is an essential feature for initial detection of frame with bleeding. Additionally, it uses the texture which plays an important role to extract more information from the lesion captured in the frames and allows the system to distinguish finely between borderline cases. The detection algorithm utilizes machine-learning-based classification methods, and it can efficiently distinguish between bleeding and nonbleeding frames and perform pixel-level segmentation of bleeding areas in WCE frames. The performed experimental studies demonstrate the performance of the proposed bleeding detection method in terms of detection accuracy, where we are at least as good as the state-of-the-art approaches. In this research, we have conducted a broad comparison of a number of different state-of-the-art features and classification methods that allows building an efficient and flexible WCE video processing system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available