4.4 Article

Citrus aurantium Aroma for Anxiety in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 833-839

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2019.0061

Keywords

acute coronary syndrome; neroli oil; anxiety; Citrus aurantium L; aromatherapy; traditional Persian medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study evaluated the antianxiety effect of Citrus aurantium aroma (neroli oil) inhalation on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Design: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Setting/Location: This study was conducted in the Coronary Care Unit of Torfeh Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from September 2017 to February 2018. Subjects: A total of 140 hospitalized ACS patients (mean age = 56.72 +/- 11.38 years) Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to citrus aroma and placebo groups to receive inhalation aromatherapy 2 days after hospitalization. Citrus aroma was 30% essential oil of Citrus aurantium L. flowers in paraffin, which was administrated three times a day. The placebo group received paraffin similarly. Outcome measures: The rate of anxiety was measured at baseline and after intervention using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results: At baseline, citrus aroma and placebo groups were similar in demographic characteristics as well as anxiety scores. After intervention, mean anxiety scores in the two groups become significantly different; the scores were 34.66 +/- 9.6 and 42.36 +/- 6.4 for citrus aroma and placebo groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). No side effect was observed. Conclusions: According to the current findings, aromatherapy with Citrus aurantium L. aroma (neroli oil) may be a safe and efficient intervention and can be considered an easy and applicable method to reduce anxiety in patients with ACS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available