4.6 Review

Adolescent Internet Addiction in Hong Kong: Prevalence, Psychosocial Correlates, and Prevention

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages S34-S43

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of Internet addiction (IA) and its correlates among Hong Kong adolescents and local prevention programs for adolescents' IA were reviewed and analyzed, with a view to identifying service gaps and making suggestions onways forward. From 8 papers identified from ProQuest and EBSCOhost, published from 2009 to 2018, the local prevalence rates of IA in adolescents were noted to range from 3.0% to 26.8%, which was higher than that in other regions of the world. The more recent the studies, the higher the prevalence rate. Seven papers provided the correlates of IA. Risk factors for IA included being male, higher school grade, poor academic performance, with depression, suicidal ideation, from disorganized family, with family members having IA, parents with lower education level, and using restrictive parenting style. Teens with self-confidence, higher school performance, having positive youth development qualities, with well-educated parents, were found to be protective against IA. IA adversely affects adolescents' growth and physical, mental, and psychosocial development. Ten prevention programs were identified from these search engines as well as government departments and agencies' Web sites. They all focused on education, skills training, behavior modification, and raising public awareness. Unlike tobacco and alcohol, the Internet is a tool, and media literacy has become an essential skill. Based on current evidence, modifiable protective factors should be strengthened to curb the problem. (C) 2019 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available