4.3 Article

Glutaraldehyde-wheat gluten protein adhesives for wood bonding

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADHESION
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 88-100

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2019.1630821

Keywords

Wheat protein; adhesive for wood; bonding performance; thermal performance

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that modification by glutaraldehyde can effectively improve the bonding performance of wheat protein adhesives, and the use of PEI as a crosslinking agent significantly enhances the bonding properties of glutaraldehyde-modified wheat protein adhesives. TMA analysis showed changes in adhesive properties after addition of the PEI cross-linking agent.
Wheat gluten protein hydrolysate was used as a biomass feedstock to prepare environmentally friendly protein-based adhesives, with hydrolyzed wheat protein as control. Glutaraldehyde was used to modify it to obtain a glutaraldehyde-wheat protein (GP) adhesive. Polyethylenimine (PEI) was also used as a crosslinking agent. Plywood has been prepared and tested, and its performance was used to measure the wheat gluten protein hydrolysate adhesive bonding performance. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermomechanical analysis (TMA) were used to analyze the adhesive thermal properties and the microstructures of the cured adhesives by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results show that modification by glutaraldehyde can effectively improve the bonding performance of wheat protein adhesives, the plywood bonded strength having been improved by its addition. The effect of PEI as a crosslinking agent became evident. It can greatly improve the bonding properties of glutaraldehyde-modified wheat protein adhesives. TMA analysis indicates that the glutaraldehyde-modified GP adhesive has a higher storage modulus than the unmodified one. The modulus of the adhesive increased after adding the PEI cross-linking agent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available