4.6 Review

Updated Expert Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing for Guiding P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Treatment in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 12, Issue 16, Pages 1521-1537

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.034

Keywords

genotyping; P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor; platelet function testing; thrombosis

Funding

  1. ZonMw
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Abbott
  4. Daiichi Sankyo
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Bayer
  7. Amarin
  8. Amgen
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Chiesi
  11. Eisai
  12. Ethicon
  13. Forest Laboratories
  14. Idorsia
  15. Ironwood
  16. Ischemix
  17. Eli Lilly
  18. Medtronic
  19. PhaseBio
  20. Pfizer
  21. Regeneron
  22. Roche
  23. Sanofi
  24. Synaptic
  25. The Medicines Company
  26. Boston
  27. Biosensors
  28. National Institutes of Health
  29. Medicure
  30. Instrumentation Labs
  31. Haemonetics
  32. Ionis
  33. Janssen
  34. Merck
  35. Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology
  36. Han-mi Pharmaceuticals
  37. Yuhan Daewoong Pharmaceuticals
  38. Otsuka
  39. Beth Israel Deaconess
  40. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi
  41. CSL Behring
  42. Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo
  43. Novartis
  44. OrbusNeich
  45. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  46. Osprey Medical
  47. Watermark Research Partners
  48. NIH/NHLBI [U01HL128606]
  49. Quark Pharmaceuticals
  50. GlaxoSmithKline
  51. Intarcia
  52. Janssen Research and Development
  53. MedImmune
  54. Poxel
  55. Takeda
  56. Roche Diagnostics
  57. Eli Lilly Canada
  58. Spartan Biosciences
  59. Aggredyne
  60. Diapharma/Roche Diagnostics
  61. PlaqueTec
  62. Abbott Vascular
  63. Biotronik
  64. Boston Scientific

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor is the standard treatment for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The availability of different P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) with varying levels of potency has enabled physicians to contemplate individualized treatment regimens, which may include escalation or de-escalation of P2Y(12)-inhibiting therapy. Indeed, individualized and alternative DAPT strategies may be chosen according to the clinical setting (stable coronary artery disease vs. acute coronary syndrome), the stage of the disease (early-vs. long-term treatment), and patient risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. A tailored DAPT approach may be potentially guided by platelet function testing (PFT) or genetic testing. Although the routine use of PFT or genetic testing in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients is not recommended, recent data have led to an update in guideline recommendations that allow considering selective use of PFT for DAPT de-escalation. However, guidelines do not expand on when to implement the selective use of such assays into decision making for personalized treatment approaches. Therefore, an international expert consensus group of key leaders from North America, Asia, and Europe with expertise in the field of antiplatelet treatment was convened. This document updates 2 prior consensus papers on this topic and summarizes the contemporary updated expert consensus recommendations for the selective use of PFT or genotyping in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. (c) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available