Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Reviews, reviewers and reviewing
Ancuta Zazgyva et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2017)
The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
Michail Kovanis et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
Maria K. Kowalczuk et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
Global gender disparities in science
Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al.
NATURE (2013)
The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest
Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick et al.
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION (2013)
Reviewing for Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Richard A. Brand
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)
Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
Elizabeth Wager et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2006)
Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
S Schroter et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Reviewing the reviewers:: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology
MA Kliewer et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2005)
Share Paper
