4.7 Article

Design of physical user-robot interactions for model identification of soft actuators on exoskeleton robots

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 397-410

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364919853618

Keywords

Soft actuators; exoskeleton robots; physical human– robot interactions; human-in-the-loop; Gaussian process; active learning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a novel approach to obtaining accurate soft actuator models through physical user-robot interactions, successfully identifying PAM models and showing that data acquired through interactions can lead to more accurate soft actuator models for exoskeleton robots than data acquired without such interactions.
Recent breakthroughs in wearable robots, such as exoskeleton robots with soft actuators and soft exosuits, have enabled the use of safe and comfortable movement assistance. However, modeling and identification methods for soft actuators used in wearable robots have yet to be sufficiently explored. In this study, we propose a novel approach for obtaining accurate soft actuator models through the design of physical user-robot interactions for wearable robots, in which the user applies external forces to the robot. To obtain an accurate soft actuator model from the limited amount of data acquired through an interaction, we leverage an active learning framework based on Gaussian process regression. We conducted experiments using a two-degree-of-freedom upper-limb exoskeleton robot with four pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs). Experimental results showed that physical interactions between the exoskeleton robot and the user were successfully designed to allow PAM models to be identified. Furthermore, we found that data acquired through an interaction could result in more accurate soft actuator models for the exoskeleton robots than data acquired without a physical interaction between the exoskeleton robot and the user.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available