4.5 Article

Enhancement of phytoextraction of Pb by compounded activation agent derived from fruit residue

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
Volume 21, Issue 14, Pages 1449-1456

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1633266

Keywords

Chelate-assisted phytoextraction; compounded activation agent; fruit residue; Pb

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Projects of China [2016YFD0800802, 2017YFD0200102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477104, 41671315]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ18D010001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chelate-assisted phytoextraction is an attractive strategy to remove toxic metals from soil. However, there is lack of an effective and sustainable chelating agent. In this study, 11 kinds of fruit residue were extracted and selected to combine with N, N-bis (carboxymethyl) glutamic acid (GLDA) (0.7%) and tea saponin (4%) for the compounded activation agent (CAA), and its enhancement on Pb phytoextraction by Sedum alfredii was further evaluated by pot experiment. Among 11 fruit residue extracts, lemon residue showed the highest ability (34.7%) to extract Pb from soil. Through combining with GLDA (0.7%) and tea saponin (4%) at the optimal volume ratio of 15:2.5:2.5, the CAA removed Pb most effectively (57.1%) from soil and increased the solubility of three Pb mineral (PbS, PbCO3 and PbSO4) by 8.7-56.4 times. In pot experiment, the addition of high dosage (15 mL) CAA increased the biomass of S. alfredii by 52% and doubled the Pb accumulation. In addition, CAA-assisted phytoextraction also increased both water-soluble and acid-soluble Pb in soil, while reduced the proportion of the immobile Pb (oxidizable and residual). Generally, the compounded activation agent derived from lemon residue could be considered as-a promising enhancer for Pb phytoextraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available