Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 43, Issue 10, Pages 1891-1902Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41366-019-0407-z
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1041352, 1109355]
- Royal Children's Hospital Foundation [2014-241]
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute
- Financial Markets Foundation for Children [2014-055]
- Victorian Deaf Education Institute
- NHMRC: MW [1046518]
- Dutch Diabetes Foundation [2013.81.1664]
- Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
- FKM [1037449, 1111160]
- LG [1035100]
- University of Melbourne
- National Heart Foundation of Australia [100660]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives Snacks contribute to overconsumption of energy-dense foods and thence obesity. Previous studies in this area are limited by self-reported data and small samples. In a large population-based cohort of parent-child dyads, we investigated how modification of pre-packaged snack food, i.e. (a) item quantity and variety, and (b) dishware (boxed container) size affected intake. Methods Design: Randomized trial nested within the cross-sectional Child Health CheckPoint of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, clustered by day of visit. Sample: 1299 11-12 year olds, 1274 parents. Exposure: 2 x 2 manipulation of snack box container size and item quantity/variety: (1) small box, few items, (2) large box, few items, (3) small box, more items, (4) large box, more items. Procedure: Participants received a snack box during a 15 min break within their 3.5 h visit; any snacks remaining were weighed. Outcomes: Consumed quantity (grams) and energy intake (kilojoules). Analyses: Unadjusted linear regression. Results Children who were offered a greater quantity and variety of snack items consumed considerably more energy and a slightly higher food mass (main effect for energy intake: 349 kJ, 95% CI 282-416, standardized mean difference (effect size) 0.66; main effect for mass: 10 g, 95% CI 3-17, effect size 0.17). In contrast, manipulating box size had little effect on child consumption, and neither box size nor quantity/variety of items consistently affected adults' consumption. Conclusion In children, reducing the number and variety of snack food items available may be a more fruitful intervention than focusing on container or dishware size. Effects observed among adults were small, although we could not exclude social desirability bias in adults aware of observation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available