4.7 Article

Co-digestion of cassava starch wastewater with buffalo dung for bio-hydrogen production

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 29, Pages 14694-14706

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.138

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Renewable energy; Biogas; Animal manure; Agro-industrial wastewater

Funding

  1. National Research University Project of Thailand
  2. Office of the Higher Education Commission through the Biofuels Research Cluster of Khon Kaen University
  3. Fermentation Research Center for Value-Added Agricultural Products
  4. Khon Kaen University
  5. Research Group for Development of Microbial Hydrogen Production Process from Biomass, Khon Kaen University
  6. TRF Senior Research Scholar [RTA5980004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Batch and continuous modes for bio-hydrogen production by co-digesting cassava starch wastewater with buffalo dung were investigated. Response surface methodology with central composite design was used to optimize the bio-hydrogen production conditions. A hydrogen production potential of 1787 mL H-2/L was achieved under optimal conditions of 2.84 g/L of NaHCO3, an initial pH of 6.77 and a total chemical oxygen demand (tCOD)/total nitrogen ratio of 42.36. A continuous stirred tank reactor was operated under the optimum conditions from batch mode to investigate the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 72, 60 and 48 h on hydrogen production. The highest hydrogen content, hydrogen production rate and hydrogen yield of 33%, 839 mL H-2/L.d and 16.90 mL H-2/g-CODaddead, respectively, were achieved at a HRT of 60 h. The predominant hydrogen producer under the optimal conditions in batch mode was Clostridium sp. while Clostridium sp., Megasphaera sp. and Chloroflexi sp. were observed in the continuous hydrogen production mode at an optimal HRT. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available