4.7 Article

Preliminary assessment of underground hydrogen storage sites in Ontario, Canada

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 29, Pages 15193-15204

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.113

Keywords

Underground hydrogen storage; Ontario; Salt deposits; Deep saline aquifers; Depleted hydrocarbon deposits; Hard rock caverns

Funding

  1. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited through the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories' Federal Science and Technology Energy Program (under project Energy Storage and Energy Conversion) [FST-51100.50.17.18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The replacement of coal-fired power plants with increasing proportions of renewable and nuclear energies in the province of Ontario highlights the need to balance seasonal energy demands. This can be achieved through power-to-gas technology, where excess energy is used to generate hydrogen gas through electrolysis, and the generation is coupled with underground hydrogen storage. This article presents a preliminary assessment regarding the potential for underground hydrogen storage in geological formations including salt and hard rock caverns, depleted oil and gas fields, and saline aquifers in Ontario, highlighting potential locations where future storage could be feasible. Southern Ontario presents many potential storage options, including Silurian bedded salts, depleted Ordovician natural gas reservoirs, saline aquifers in Cambrian sandstone and hard rock caverns in argillaceous limestones. Hard rock caverns in Precambrian crystalline rocks of the Canadian Shield are also discussed, in addition to the potential for the use of lined rock caverns. This work aims to provide a basis for further research regarding the appropriate location of underground hydrogen gas storage facilities in Ontario. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available