4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Enhanced current production of the anode modified by microalgae derived nitrogen-rich biocarbon for microbial fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 3833-3839

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.199

Keywords

Microbial fuel cells; Anode modification; Nitrogen-rich biocarbon; Chlorella pyrenoidosa

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Outstanding Young Scholar [51622602]
  2. National Natural Science Funds for Young Scholar [51506017]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of Chongqing, China [cx2017017]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [cstc2017jcyjAX0203]
  5. Program for Back-up Talent Development of Chongqing University [cqu2018CDHB1A03]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018CDXYDL0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, nitrogen-rich biocarbon derived from carbonized Chlorella pyrenoidosa (CCP) was proposed to enhance the current generation from the anode of microbial fuel cells (MFCs). The results revealed that the carbon cloth decorated by CCP (CCP-CC) achieved the highest bioelectrocatalytic current density of 13.44 +/- 0.34 A m(-2) after the successful startup, which was 12% and 22% higher than those with carbon black (CB-CC) and the bare carbon cloth (CC), respectively. The results can be attributed to the advantages of CCP-CC over CB-CC and CC in terms of a higher active biomass content, a much smaller charge transfer resistance resulting from the facilitated direct electron transfer due to the presence of N-containing functional groups in CCP and the enhanced mediated electron transfer caused by the larger surface area of the CCP-CC anode for the flavin mediator adsorption. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available