Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States
Sabrina Piedimonte et al.
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY (2019)
Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
Jin Hee Kim et al.
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2019)
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer
David Cibula et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2018)
The LACC Trial: Has Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Been Dealt a Knockout Punch?
Mario M. Leitao
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2018)
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Pedro T. Ramirez et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Surgery in Cervical Cancer
Amanda N. Fader
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
Khadra Galaal et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yue Zhao et al.
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES (2017)
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy
Elisabeth Diver et al.
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY (2017)
Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
D. A. Park et al.
EJSO (2017)
Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer
Tae-Wook Kong et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (2016)
Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer
B. M. Sert et al.
EJSO (2016)
Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience
Alberto A. Mendivil et al.
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD (2016)
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer
Yan-zhou Wang et al.
BMC CANCER (2015)
Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sherif A. M. Shazly et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2015)
Locoregional Recurrence After Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy: The Vaginal Cuff Must Be Closed to Avoid Tumor Cell Contamination of the Peritoneal Cavity
Achim Schneider et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2015)
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study
J. -H. Nam et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2012)
From laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
C. Koehler et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2012)
Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study
F. Landoni et al.
EJSO (2012)
Does a uterine manipulator affect cervical cancer pathology or identification of lymphovascular space involvement?
Joseph A. Rakowski et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2012)
Validity of Laparoscopic Staging to Avoid Adjuvant Chemoradiation following Radical Surgery in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer
Simone Marnitz et al.
ONCOLOGY (2012)
Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review
C. B. M. Kruijdenberg et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2011)
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with the use of a modified uterine manipulator for the management of stage IB1 cervix cancer
J. C. Canton-Romero et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2010)
A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy
John F. Boggess et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2008)
Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer
Michael Frumovitz et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2007)
Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center:: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectornies
C Köhler et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2004)
Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH):: prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer
H Hertel et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2003)
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: Surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up
NM Spirtos et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2002)
Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: A prospective randomized study
F Landoni et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2001)
Share Paper
