4.7 Article

Reflection on modern methods: when worlds collide-prediction, machine learning and causal inference

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 2058-2064

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz132

Keywords

Machine learning; causal inference; prediction; potential outcomes

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand Programme Grant [16/443]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) Future Fellowships [FT150100131]
  3. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence [GNT1099422]
  4. NIH Director's New Innovator Award [DP2-MD012722]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Causal inference requires theory and prior knowledge to structure analyses, and is not usually thought of as an arena for the application of prediction modelling. However, contemporary causal inference methods, premised on counterfactual or potential outcomes approaches, often include processing steps before the final estimation step. The purposes of this paper are: (i) to overview the recent emergence of prediction underpinning steps in contemporary causal inference methods as a useful perspective on contemporary causal inference methods, and (ii) explore the role of machine learning (as one approach to 'best prediction') in causal inference. Causal inference methods covered include propensity scores, inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs), G computation and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). Machine learning has been used more for propensity scores and TMLE, and there is potential for increased use in G computation and estimation of IPTWs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available