4.7 Article

Polyphenol intake and differentiated thyroid cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 146, Issue 7, Pages 1841-1850

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32589

Keywords

polyphenols; flavonoids; intake; thyroid cancer; cohort; EPIC

Categories

Funding

  1. Institute of Health Carlos III
  2. European Social Fund (ESF)
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Swedish Cancer Society
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. County Council of Skane (Sweden)
  8. County Council of Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  9. Health Research Funds
  10. AGAUR - Generalitat de Catalunya
  11. Regional Government of Andalucia
  12. Regional Government of Asturias
  13. Regional Government of Basque Country
  14. Regional Government of Murcia
  15. Regional Government of Navarra
  16. EPIC-Murcia
  17. Health Research Fund (FIS)
  18. European Research Council
  19. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS) (The Netherlands)
  20. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR) (The Netherlands)
  21. LK Research Funds (The Netherlands)
  22. Dutch Prevention Funds (The Netherlands)
  23. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland) (The Netherlands)
  24. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) (The Netherlands)
  25. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands)
  26. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy
  27. National Research Council (Italy)
  28. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  29. German Cancer Aid (Germany)
  30. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Germany)
  31. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)
  32. Deutsche Krebshilfe (Germany)
  33. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (Germany)
  34. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  35. Ligue Contre le Cancer (France)
  36. Institut Gustave Roussy (France)
  37. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (France)
  38. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  39. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  40. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  41. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  42. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) A way to build Europe
  43. Institute of Health Carlos III, Spain
  44. MRC [G0500300, MR/N003284/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyphenols are bioactive compounds with several anticarcinogenic activities; however, human data regarding associations with thyroid cancer (TC) is still negligible. Our aim was to evaluate the association between intakes of total, classes and subclasses of polyphenols and risk of differentiated TC and its main subtypes, papillary and follicular, in a European population. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort included 476,108 men and women from 10 European countries. During a mean follow-up of 14 years, there were 748 incident differentiated TC cases, including 601 papillary and 109 follicular tumors. Polyphenol intake was estimated at baseline using validated center/country-specific dietary questionnaires and the Phenol-Explorer database. In multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models, no association between total polyphenol and the risks of overall differentiated TC (HRQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.29), papillary (HRQ4 vs. Q1 = 1.06, 95% CI 0.80-1.41) or follicular TC (HRQ4 vs. Q1 = 1.10, 95% CI 0.55-2.22) were found. No associations were observed either for flavonoids, phenolic acids or the rest of classes and subclasses of polyphenols. After stratification by body mass index (BMI), an inverse association between the intake of polyphenols (p-trend = 0.019) and phenolic acids (p-trend = 0.007) and differentiated TC risk in subjects with BMI >= 25 was observed. In conclusion, our study showed no associations between dietary polyphenol intake and differentiated TC risk; although further studies are warranted to investigate the potential protective associations in overweight and obese individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available