4.6 Article

Ferroelectric-like hysteresis loop originated from non-ferroelectric effects

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 109, Issue 10, Pages 141-145

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4962387

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2014R1A1A1008061]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A1A1008061] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) has provided advanced nanoscale understanding and analysis of ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties. In PFM-based studies, electromechanical strain induced by the converse piezoelectric effect is probed and analyzed as a PFM response. However, electromechanical strain can also arise from several non-piezoelectric origins that may lead to a misinterpretation of the observed response. Among them, electrostatic interaction can significantly affect the PFM response. Nonetheless, previous studies explored solely the influence of electrostatic interaction on the PFM response under the situation accompanied with polarization switching. Here, we show the influence of the electrostatic interaction in the absence of polarization switching by using unipolar voltage sweep. The obtained results reveal that the electromechanical neutralization between piezoresponse of polarization and electrostatic interaction plays a crucial role in the observed ferroelectric-like hysteresis loop despite the absence of polarization switching. Thus, our work can provide a basic guideline for the correct interpretation of the hysteresis loop in PFM-based studies. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available