4.7 Article

RhoA inhibitor suppresses the production of microvesicles and rescues high ventilation induced lung injury

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 74-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.03.059

Keywords

RhoA/Rock signaling; Microvesicles; Ventilator; Lung injury

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670079]
  2. Basic Ability Improvement Project for Young and Middle-aged Teachers of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2017KY0087]
  3. International Communication of Guangxi Medical University Graduate Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microvesicles (MVs) have been extensively identified in various biological fluids including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), peripheral blood and ascitic fluids. Our previous study showed that MVs are responsible for acute lung injury, but the exact mechanism underlying MVs formation remains poorly understood. In the present study, we investigate the potential role of RhoA/Rock signaling in MVs generation and the biological activity of MVs in ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Our results revealed that high tide ventilation induced super MVs releasing into the lung and subsequently caused lung inflammation. Strikingly, intratracheal instillation of MVs that isolated from highly ventilated mice triggered significant lung inflammation in naive mice. The MVs production is strongly correlated with lung inflammation and the upregulation of RhoA, Rock and phospho-Limk (phosphorylation of Limk is the activated form). RhoA inhibitor decreased the expression of Rock and the phosphorylation of Limk, decreased MVs production and alleviated lung inflammation. Rock inhibitor also decreased the phosphorylation of Limk, decreased MVs production and alleviated lung inflammation. Our data demonstrated that the production of MVs requires RhoA/Rock signaling, and VILI might be potentially prevented by targeting RhoA/Rock signaling pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available