4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Challenges and Prospects for Testing the Mother's Curse Hypothesis

Journal

INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 875-889

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icz110

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP170100165, FT160100022, DE190100831]
  2. National Science Foundation [IOS-1839203]
  3. Company of Biologists [EA1694]
  4. Crustacean Society
  5. SICB Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry
  6. SICB Division of Invertebrate Zoology
  7. SICB Division of Phylogenetics and Comparative Biology
  8. Monash University Faculty of Science Advancing Women's Success grant
  9. Australian Research Council [FT160100022, DE190100831] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) renders selection blind to mutations whose effects are limited to males. Evolutionary theory predicts this will lead to the accumulation of a male-specific genetic load within the mitochondrial genomes of populations; that is, a pool of mutations that negatively affects male, but not female, fitness components. This principle has been termed the Mother's Curse hypothesis. While the hypothesis has received some empirical support, its relevance to natural populations of metazoans remains unclear, and these ambiguities are compounded by the lack of a clear predictive framework for studies attempting to test Mother's Curse. Here, we seek to redress this by outlining the core predictions of the hypothesis, as well as the key features of the experimental designs that are required to enable direct testing of the predictions. Our goal is to provide a roadmap for future research seeking to elucidate the evolutionary significance of the Mother's Curse hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available