4.7 Article

Detoxification of hazelnuts by different cold plasmas and gamma irradiation treatments

Journal

INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 252-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.05.002

Keywords

Cold plasma; Aflatoxin; Gamma irradiation; Hazelnut; Detoxification; Sensory

Funding

  1. Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [TOVAG 1110570]
  2. COST action [MP1101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detoxification effects of cold atmospheric-pressure (AP,3000 L/h of air, 25 kHz, 655 W-1.7 min) and low-pressure (LP,air-100 W-30 min) plasmas and gamma irradiation(GMI,10 kGy-10 min) treatments on different concentrations of pure aflatoxin B1(AFB1) and AFB1 + B2 (TotAFs) as well as same toxins spiked on hazelnut were investigated. Both plasmas reduced 72-73% of AFB1 (3 ppb) spiked on hazelnuts while GMI reduced 47% of AFB1. TotAFs (6 ppb) reductions on hazelnut after both plasmas were 70-71%, which was also higher than that of GMI (15.5%). However, the reductions in pure AFB1 at 1-50 ppb and TotAFs at 1.03-51.5 ppb after GMI (97-100%) were higher than those of AP (55-75%) and LP (69-90%) plasmas. AP plasma has the potential to be an alternative to conventional detoxification methods because it is both effective on aflatoxins in foods and maintains the sensory attributes of food evaluated by a sensory panel. Industry relevance: The use of plasma technology in foods for detoxification purposes is an economic alternative to conventional and other non-thermal processes as well as meeting the industry's demand for sustainable development. This study showed that different cold plasmas are capable of reducing the aflatoxins as pure forms as well as in food. The results contributed to the understanding of cold plasma detoxification effects on aflatoxins and could be a basis for a possible industrial implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available