4.7 Article

A Deep Look into neural ranking models for information retrieval

Journal

INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102067

Keywords

Neural ranking model; Information retrieval; Survey

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61425016, 61722211]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [20144310]
  3. UMass Amherst Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval
  4. NSF [IIS-1715095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ranking models lie at the heart of research on information retrieval (IR). During the past decades, different techniques have been proposed for constructing ranking models, from traditional heuristic methods, probabilistic methods, to modern machine learning methods. Recently, with the advance of deep learning technology, we have witnessed a growing body of work in applying shallow or deep neural networks to the ranking problem in IR, referred to as neural ranking models in this paper. The power of neural ranking models lies in the ability to learn from the raw text inputs for the ranking problem to avoid many limitations of hand-crafted features. Neural networks have sufficient capacity to model complicated tasks, which is needed to handle the complexity of relevance estimation in ranking. Since there have been a large variety of neural ranking models proposed, we believe it is the right time to summarize the current status, learn from existing methodologies, and gain some insights for future development. In contrast to existing reviews, in this survey, we will take a deep look into the neural ranking models from different dimensions to analyze their underlying assumptions, major design principles, and learning strategies. We compare these models through benchmark tasks to obtain a comprehensive empirical understanding of the existing techniques. We will also discuss what is missing in the current literature and what are the promising and desired future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available