3.9 Article

Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments

Journal

IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 289-295

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000885

Keywords

compatible abutment; implant-abutment junction; internal connection; misfit; scanning electron microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fit of nonoriginal abutments to implants at the implant abutment junction. Materials and Methods: Twenty titanium implants from a single manufacturer were randomly divided into 2 groups of ten each. Ten titanium premachined original abutments (group I) and ten titanium premachined nonoriginal abutments (from different manufacturerd-group II) were connected to the implants with the recommended manufacturer torque level and then embedded into autopolymerizing clear acrylic resin blocks. After overnight curing, these blocks were vertically sectioned using water jet sectioning machine and evaluated under scanning electron microscope following the sequential cleaning procedures. The microgap at the implant-abutment interface for all the samples was measured using pixel counting software and subjected to statistical analysis using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The mean microgap at the implant-abutment interface at the external, middle, and internal points was 1.597, 1.399, and 1.831 mm, respectively, for group I and 2.395, 2.488, and 3.339 mm, respectively, for group II samples. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test showed statistically significant difference between 2 groups at the midpoint for the nonoriginal abutments compared with the original ones. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, the mean microgap at the implant-abutment interface at the platform level at the external, middle, and internal points for both original abutments and nonoriginal abutments was found to be within clinically acceptable limits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available