4.8 Article

Neuropeptide CGRP Limits Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses and Constrains Type 2 Inflammation

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 682-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.009

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Programs of NIAMS
  2. NIAID
  3. National Institutes of Health [AI074878, AI095466, AI095608, AI102942]
  4. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  5. Crohn's & Colitis Foundation
  6. Cure for IBD
  7. Rosanne H. Silberman Foundation
  8. JSPS Research Fellowship for Japanese Biomedical and Behavioral Researchers at NIH
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001132] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [ZIAAR041159] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Innate lymphocytes maintain tissue homeostasis at mucosal barriers, with group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) producing type 2 cytokines and controlling helminth infection. While the molecular understanding of ILC2 responses has advanced, the complexity of microenvironmental factors impacting ILC2s is becoming increasingly apparent. Herein, we used single-cell analysis to explore the diversity of gene expression among lung lymphocytes during helminth infection. Following infection, we identified a subset of ILC2s that preferentially expressed Il5-encoding interleu kin (IL)-5, together with Ca/ca-encoding calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its cognate receptor components. CGRP in concert with IL-33 and neuromedin U (NMU) supported IL-5 but constrained IL-13 expression and ILC2 proliferation. Without CGRP signaling, ILC2 responses and worm expulsion were enhanced. Collectively, these data point to CGRP as a context-dependent negative regulatory factor that shapes innate lymphocyte responses to alarmins and neuropeptides during type 2 innate immune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available