4.7 Article

A Novel Two-Step Registration Method for Remote Sensing Images Based on Deep and Local Features

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 57, Issue 7, Pages 4834-4843

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2893310

Keywords

CNN; local feature; registration; remote sensing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61702392, U1701267]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JB181704, JBX170311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automatic remote sensing image registration has achieved great accomplishment. However, it is still a vital challenging problem to develop a robust and accurate registration method due to the negative effects of noise and imaging differences between images. For these images, it is difficult to guarantee the accuracy and robustness at the same time for one-step registration methods. To address this issue, we introduce an effective coarse-to-fine strategy and develop a new two-step registration method based on deep and local features in this paper. The first step is to calculate the approximate spatial relationship, which is obtained by a convolutional neural network. This step makes full use of the deep features to match and can generate stable results. For the second step, a matching strategy considering spatial relationship is applied to the local feature-based method. In addition, this step adopts more accurate features in location to adjust the results of the previous step. A variety of homologous and multimodal remote sensing images, including optical, synthetic aperture radar, and general map images, are used to evaluate the proposed method. The comparison experiments demonstrate that our method can apparently increase the correct correspondences, can improve the ratio of correct correspondences, and is highly robust and accurate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available