4.6 Review

Relationship between relative skeletal muscle mass and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 115-126

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-019-09964-1

Keywords

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Steatohepatitis; Liver fibrosis; Sarcopenia; Skeletal muscle mass

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700485] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0908900] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aim Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has gradually become one of the most common chronic liver diseases in the world. More and more evidence shows that low skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) may play a role in the development of NAFLD. Our aim was to quantify the association between SMI, sarcopenia and the presence and severity of NAFLD. Methods We systematically searched English relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science and the Cochrane Library updated to December 20th, 2018. Studies in which SMI was compared between NAFLD cases and controls were included. So were studies concerning the odds ratio (OR) of NAFLD, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and significant fibrosis in sarcopenia patients. Pooled weighted mean differences and ORs were calculated. Results Of the 1331 retrieved studies, 19 articles were included. SMI level in NAFLD patients was 1.77 (95% CI 1.15, 2.39) lower than that in normal controls. We also found a significantly higher occurrence risk of NAFLD (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.48), NASH (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.57) and NAFLD-related significant fibrosis (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.34, 1.78) in sarcopenia subjects. Conclusions SMI level in patients with NAFLD was lower than healthy people, and patients with sarcopenia have higher occurrence risk of NAFLD, as well as its advanced stages including NASH or NAFLD-related significant fibrosis. Further well-designed prospective studies are required to strengthen the arguments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available