4.4 Article

Incidence of false-positive transmissions during remote rhythm monitoring with implantable loop recorders

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 75-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.015

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Cryptogenic stroke; Implantable loop recorder; Remote transmissions; Syncope

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Implantable loop recorder (ILR) is preferred strategy for prolonged rhythm monitoring. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and causes of false-positive (FP) diagnoses during remote monitoring with ILR. METHODS During a 4-week study period, all consecutive remote transmissions in patients with ILR (Reveal LINQ, Medtronic) implanted for atrial fibrillation (AF) surveillance, cryptogenic stroke (CS), and syncope were reviewed. A nurse specializing in device management and an electrophysiologist adjudicated all transmissions. Primary endpoint of the study was incidence of FP in patients with AF, CS, and syncope. RESULTS A total of 695 remote transmissions (scheduled downloads: 414; Alerts: 281) sent from 559 patients were adjudicated. The majority of patients had ILR for AF surveillance (n = 321), followed by CS (n = 168) and syncope (n = 70) with nominal programming for rhythm diagnosis. Incidence of FP transmissions during the study period was 46%, 86%, and 71% in patients with AF, CS, and syncope, respectively. Incidence of FP transmissions was higher in patients with CS and syncope than in patients with AF (P < .001). For scheduled transmissions, primary causes of FP were signal dropout and undersensing; for alert transmissions, primary reasons for FP were premature atrial and ventricular ectopy. CONCLUSION Incidence of FP during remote monitoring with nominal settings on this ILR was substantial, ranging from 46% to 86% depending on the indication for implantation. Adjudication of these transmissions required a considerable time commitment from electrophysiologists and device clinic personnel but would be required to avoid misdiagnosis and potential errors in clinical management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available