4.4 Article

Ephrin/Eph receptor interaction facilitates macrophage recognition of differentiating human erythroblasts

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 914-924

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.215160

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHS Blood and Transplant RD grants [WP15-05]
  2. Wellcome Trust PhD studentship (LHON) [105385/Z/14/Z]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Blood and Transfusion Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Red Cell Products [NIHRBTRU-2015-10032]
  4. Wellcome Trust [105385/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Erythropoiesis is one of the most efficient cellular processes in the human body producing approximately 2.5 million red blood cells every second. This process occurs in a bone marrow niche comprised of a central resident macrophage surrounded by differentiating erythroblasts, termed an erythroblastic island. It is not known what initially attracts the macrophage to erythroblasts to form these islands. The ephrin/Eph receptor family are known to regulate heterophilic cell-cell adhesion. We find that human VCAM1(+) and VCAM1(-) bone marrow macrophages and in vitro cultured macrophages are ephrin-B2 positive, whereas differentiating human erythroblasts express EPHB4, EPHB6 and EPHA4. Furthermore, we detect a rise in integrin activation on erythroblasts at the stage at which the cells bind which is independent of EPH receptor presence. Using a live cell imaging assay, we show that specific inhibitory peptides or shRNA depletion of EPHB4 cause a significant reduction in the ability of macrophages to interact with erythroblasts but do not affect integrin activation. This study demonstrates for the first time that EPHB4 expression is required on erythroblasts to facilitate the initial recognition and subsequent interaction with macrophages, alongside the presence of active integrins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available