4.6 Article

Dry/wet pattern changes in global dryland areas over the past six decades

Journal

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 184-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.04.017

Keywords

Climate change; Dryland areas; P/PET

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19030204]
  2. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-STS-ZDTP-036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As reported in previous studies, global warming has caused a clear uptick in dryland areas since the 1950s. Meanwhile, the accelerated expansion of drylands has become particularly evident over the past 40 years, with dry/wet patterns showing significant differences prior to and after 1980. This paper uses the Precipitation/Potential evaporation (P/PET) index to analyze changes occurring in the dry/wet structure of various spatial and temporal scales during 1948-2008. The results show the emergence of complex aridity changes on a regional scale. While aridity generally decreased in the drylands of Asia during 1948-2008, the change in aridity was opposite in the drylands of the American and African continents between 1948 and 1979 and 1980-2008. Specifically, drylands in the American continent showed a wetting tendency during 1948-1979 and a drying tendency during 1980-2008, whereas drylands in the African continent underwent significant drying during 1948-1979 followed by subtle wetting in 1980-2008. Even though rapid warming since the 1980s has become an increasingly important cause of the recent global drying trend, especially in East and Central Asia, the changes in aridity in the American and African drylands is attributable to natural variabilities in precipitation associated with multi-decadal surface sea temperature changes, along with large-scale circulation patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available